In the world of Web3, superficial connections often fail to reflect the full picture. Recently, discussions regarding the relationship between Jasmy and Janction have garnered widespread attention. Some people have concluded that the two are unrelated simply because Jasmy is not directly mentioned on Janction's official website. However, this oversimplified judgment may cause us to miss deeper connections.

In the Web3 ecosystem, partnerships and project connections are often more complex and multi-layered than we might think. Relying solely on logos on a website or explicit statements to judge the relationship between two projects is a superficial way of thinking. In fact, many important partnerships and strategic alliances may not be prominently advertised on the homepage.

To understand the relationship between Jasmy and Janction, we need to delve deeper. This may involve examining the technical architecture of both projects, the background of their teams, their development philosophies, and their positioning within the broader blockchain ecosystem. Sometimes, the most important connections may be hidden in the projects' white papers, technical documents, or even community discussions.

As participants and observers in the Web3 space, we should cultivate sharper insights. We should not be deceived by surface phenomena but instead delve into the core value propositions, technological innovations, and long-term development strategies of projects. Only in this way can we truly understand the real position and potential impact of projects like Jasmy and Janction within the Web3 ecosystem.

Overall, the world of Web3 is much more complex than the logos and fonts on the homepage. Before reaching a conclusion, we need a more comprehensive and in-depth study and analysis. Only then can we truly grasp the fast-evolving pulse of the Web3 field and understand the intricate network of relationships between projects.